Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Steven Trogdon <strogdon@×××××.edu>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] notebook backtrace
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 01:03:18
Message-Id: 1272589176.26964.0@ledaig
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] notebook backtrace by "François Bissey"
1 On 04/29/10 - 19:18:03, François Bissey wrote:
2 > > Hello,
3 > >
4 > > Has anyone experienced the following after closing a worksheet and
5 > then
6 > > the notebook? I believe I've seen something similar on another
7 > > (sage-4.4) occasion unrelated to the notebook.
8 > >
9 > If you only saw that in sage, that could point to twisted-web2 which
10 > is a real
11 > piece of garbage abandoned upstream but that sage-notebook doesn't
12 > want
13 > to let go. If it is not related to the notebook at all, then that's a
14 > problem
15 > that could creep into other non-sage apps in my opinion.
16 > Did you use anything special in that worksheet? maxima, etc...?
17 >
18 > Francois
19 >
20 Hi François,
21
22 There was only plotting in the worksheet. I'm thinking it's something
23 other than the notebook. I ran the test suite on sage-4.4 and there are
24 lots of these backtrace dumps with
25
26 /usr/bin/python2.6: corrupted double-linked list
27
28 issues. I reverted back to 4.3.5 in an attempt to get "sane" test
29 results. I'm unable to get the same test results; although there are no
30 backtrace dumps! There has been several upgrades (flint, fplll,
31 sqlalchemy, maxima, ..., etc) since previous tests and, as much as
32 possible, I've reverted back to previous versions but still the tests
33 don't match. The first failing test (sage-4.3.5) that passed previously
34 is
35
36 sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_advanced.rst"
37 **********************************************************************
38 File "/opt/sage/devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_advanced.rst", line 358:
39 sage: G.gens()
40 Expected:
41 (Dirichlet character modulo 20 of conductor 4 mapping 11 |--> -1,
42 17 |--> 1,
43 Dirichlet character modulo 20 of conductor 5 mapping 11 |--> 1, 17
44 |--> i)
45 Got:
46 ([-1, 1], [1, i])
47 **********************************************************************
48
49 I'd be interested in your 4.4 test results. Maybe there's something
50 I've missed.
51
52 Steve

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] notebook backtrace "François Bissey" <f.r.bissey@×××××××××.nz>
Re: [gentoo-science] notebook backtrace "François Bissey" <f.r.bissey@×××××××××.nz>