Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-science
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-science: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-science@g.o
From: François Bissey <f.r.bissey@...>
Subject: should we have virtual/clapack
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 21:53:03 +1300
Hi,

We have virtuals for blas, cblas and lapack. At the moment there is only
one package with a clapack implementation in the tree and one in the 
science overlay. These two are the only one I could find with a quick search.

With the sage development there is at least one package that depends
on a clapack implementations. So should we plan for a virtual/clapack?

Francois


Replies:
Re: should we have virtual/clapack
-- Sébastien Fabbro
Re: should we have virtual/clapack
-- Justin
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-science: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
sage on gentoo: an experimental overlay take 2
Next by thread:
Re: should we have virtual/clapack
Previous by date:
sage on gentoo: an experimental overlay take 2
Next by date:
Re: should we have virtual/clapack


Updated Mar 14, 2010

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.