Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-science
There are some other miscellaneous lam-mpi / mpich
dependencies/conflicts/gotchas in Portage; you probably won't see them
unless you're using ~x86 and trying to load the R packages that use
them. When I get some free time I'll document everything in Bugzilla.
Meanwhile, speaking of R, they are at R-2.2.0 and counting -- 2.3 should
be out in the spring. Portage appears to be stuck at R-2.1.1. Is there
any reason there hasn't been an R version bump?
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Philippe Trottier wrote:
> | I have stooped using mpich and started use lam-mpi take a look at
> that ?
>
> That's ironic, because the lam-mpi team has stopped developing lam-mpi
> and now works on openmpi [1], along with a number of other groups. =)
>
> As far as moving into the future for MPI in Gentoo goes, there's an
> mpich2 ebuild in progress, and we'll probably start working on an
> openmpi ebuild once they have a 1.0 release.
>
> Thanks,
> Donnie
>
> 1. http://www.open-mpi.org/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFDe6UHXVaO67S1rtsRAiPdAKD/G/r7DHRXymnwsoqnBzLr5xjNdgCgl7Et
> WskpoCWoUJpddnTsm4bI2e4=
> =/vLx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
--
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list
|
|