1 |
On Sunday 21 August 2005 7:43 am, Peter Bienstman wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I've been looking through the tree to see which packages use lapack/blas, |
5 |
> and which of them are prepared for the new infrastructure. There are |
6 |
> actually far less packages than I anticipated: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Still depends on old infrastructure: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> sys-cluster/hpl |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Already uses virtual/blas or virtual/lapack in unstable branch: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> dev-lang/R |
15 |
> sci-geosciences/grass |
16 |
> sci-misc/camfr |
17 |
> sci-chemistry/mpqc |
18 |
> sci-mathematics/octave |
19 |
> sci-misc/xfoil |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Uses own code, but could benefit from transition: |
22 |
> |
23 |
> dev-python/numeric (see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81520) |
24 |
|
25 |
I use numeric and scipy, and have been trying for a long time to improve the |
26 |
ebuilds to use blas/lapack/atlas. I submitted an ebuild for numeric six |
27 |
months ago (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81520), but it has |
28 |
languished in buzilla because it is not clear how to deal with ATLAS (my |
29 |
atlas USE flag was rejected). How should ATLAS dependencies be handled in the |
30 |
new infrastructure? |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Darren S. Dale |
34 |
|
35 |
Bard Hall |
36 |
Department of Materials Science and Engineering |
37 |
Cornell University |
38 |
Ithaca, NY. 14850 |
39 |
|
40 |
dd55@×××××××.edu |
41 |
http://people.ccmr.cornell.edu/~dd55/ |
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |