List Archive: gentoo-science
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
> On Monday 22 August 2005 08:48, C Y wrote:
>>Perhaps we could have a "support team" behind someone with official
>>Gentoo developer status - people could point out significant ebuilds
>>with most logic in place to the developer, help work out quirks in the
>>programs/ebuilds, and generally speed things up? Certainly the
>>developer would bear final responsibility but this way those of us with
>>five hours every month or so could help out too, particularly for
>>specialty packages. (BTY, if some genius could figure out brl-cad I
>>would be grateful - it's going to take me a year at this point :-/.)
> I was wondering myself if some people in here might be receptive to the idea
> of a support team, much like the arch testers we have for the amd64 porting
> team. It often leads on to people becoming devs, but is a great way to help
> out when you can.
> Tony Murray is filling that kind of role unofficially with all the work he
> puts into the boinc and setiathome ebuilds, whilst I review, test, improve
> and commit them once they are up to standard. I also have good contact with
> the quickplot developer who has integrated my patches upstream and helped
> significantly with the ebuilds for that package.
> I think these relationships are important, and I personally nurture them as
> much as possible. Many scientific packages are very involved and having
> people help test and work out problems can significantly increase our
> efficiency as a team.
>>There are a fair number of at least partial ebuilds for useful
>>scientific software stuck in bugzilla - brl-cad and acl2 come
>>immediately to mind, and I know there are others. Plus a fair number
>>that don't have ebuilds where it would be useful to have them. Gentoo
>>is alreay one of the best for scientific software, due to compiling
>>things being easy and our ebuild pool, but we could definitely do
> The problem comes down to manpower and a need to recruit some more people to
> the team. Having a support team similar to the arch testers could certainly
> help in our case if those people were not ready to become devs/didn't have
> the time. Once a package has been committed they would also need to help with
> version bumps and fixing bugs with the new packages ideally.
>>My machine is probably a poor test machine - what gentoo environment
>>would we need to maintain?
> Just an up to date Gentoo install is fine. If you are testing some more
> experimental stuff (I test new baselayout, glibc, gcc and other core stuff
> sometimes) then a chroot might also be adviseable. Scientific apps just
> require an up to date system.
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list