1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> Hi all, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> GCC 4.1 will be unmasked this week. A major consequence for scientific |
5 |
> users is the switch from g77 to gfortran. |
6 |
|
7 |
I've run a quick grep to see what packages clearly won't work. The |
8 |
command, which only checks for packages in sci-* and dev-*: |
9 |
|
10 |
grep -r -e 'FORTRAN=.*g77' -e 'need_fortran.*g77' sci-* dev-* |
11 |
--include='*.ebuild' | grep -v gfort |
12 |
|
13 |
Here's the results, with ebuilds pulled from the list if a newer version |
14 |
supports gfortran. |
15 |
|
16 |
I'll look at ortep3, platon, tinker, *-reference, pgplot. That just |
17 |
leaves scipy, which already has |
18 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134248 open for it. |
19 |
|
20 |
sci-chemistry/ortep3/ortep3-1.0.3.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
21 |
sci-chemistry/platon/platon-20051215.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
22 |
sci-chemistry/tinker/tinker-4.2.ebuild:FORTRAN="ifc g77" |
23 |
sci-libs/blas-reference/blas-reference-19940131-r2.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77 |
24 |
ifc" || FORTRAN="g77 f2c ifc" # No f2c on 64-bit systems yet :-/ |
25 |
|
26 |
This line ^^^ looks distinctly weird and I don't understand how it would |
27 |
ever work as desired. |
28 |
|
29 |
sci-libs/blas/blas-19980702.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
30 |
sci-libs/blas/blas-19980702-r1.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
31 |
sci-libs/blas/blas-19980702-r2.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
32 |
sci-libs/scipy/scipy-0.4.8-r1.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
33 |
sci-libs/scipy/scipy-0.4.8.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |
34 |
sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.0-r1.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77 ifc" |
35 |
sci-libs/lapack-reference/lapack-reference-3.0-r2.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77 ifc" |
36 |
sci-libs/pgplot/pgplot-5.2.2.ebuild:FORTRAN="g77" |