| 1 |
On 08:52 Mon 06 Dec , justin wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> the tcl herd is more or less dead. As there a many sci apps which rely |
| 5 |
> on tcl/tk, the question is, how we should deal with this? Contribute, |
| 6 |
> take over...? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Lets discuss this. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> One simple question, I was asked by a user, should the header |
| 11 |
> directories should be somehow generalized? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> /usr/include/tcl8.5 -> /usr/include/tcl8.5.9 |
| 14 |
> /usr/include/tcl8 -> /usr/include/tcl8.5.9 |
| 15 |
> /usr/include/tcl -> /usr/include/tcl8.5.9 |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> This would simplify cases where the buildsystem has hardcoded paths. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Don't the directories reflect tcl "ABIs", not just some kind of |
| 20 |
arbitrary version? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Thanks, |
| 24 |
Donnie |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 27 |
Sr. Developer, Science Team |
| 28 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 29 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |
Archives