| 1 |
On Sat, 17 May 2008, Sbastien Fabbro wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 18:24:35 +0700 (NOVST) |
| 3 |
> "Andrey G. Grozin" <A.G.Grozin@×××××××.su> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> I propose *not* to use an external liborigin in qtiplot. Am I right |
| 5 |
>> that liborigin is used only by qtiplot? Then it would be better to |
| 6 |
>> get rid of sci-libs/liborigin at all. It seems veru unlikely that |
| 7 |
>> anybody else (except qtiplot) will want it. And qtiplot always |
| 8 |
>> contains its own, newest and customized source of liborigin. If a |
| 9 |
>> uswer cares for Origin compatibility, he will be better off with this |
| 10 |
>> version. |
| 11 |
> At least sci-visualization/labplot uses liborigin, and someone could |
| 12 |
> want to use liborigin for its own use. |
| 13 |
> Internal copies are harmful and best avoided. The best solution is |
| 14 |
> ususally to work out with upstream to try to remove it. |
| 15 |
OK, I'll fix the ebuild to use the external liborigin. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
BTW, I've committed qwt-5.1.0 to the main tree. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Andrey |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-science@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives