| 1 |
On 04/29/10 - 20:54:32, François Bissey wrote: |
| 2 |
> > sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_advanced.rst" |
| 3 |
> That particular one works for me. I am running the full test suite at |
| 4 |
> the moment. I will probably run the tests on ppc over the week end |
| 5 |
> as well, that may be interesting. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The only thing that jump at my mind for that test would be |
| 8 |
> scipy. You should have 0.7.1 not 0.7.2 as there has been a change |
| 9 |
> of interface, that would do that kind of things I think. |
| 10 |
> But that's a shot in the dark and that wouldn't solve the first |
| 11 |
> problem you reported. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Francois |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
François, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Apparently in masking sage-4.4 to revert to 4.3.5 I had neglected to |
| 18 |
mask sage-doc-4.4. I had the wrong sage-doc installed for the test! In |
| 19 |
reverting to 4.3.5 other test failures were due to scipy as you |
| 20 |
indicate and others were due to matplotlib. I now have been able to |
| 21 |
reproduce test results I had previously for 4.3.5. Upon then upgrading |
| 22 |
to 4.4 I have _many_ failures of the "type" indicated in the first post |
| 23 |
of this thread; i.e. of the "type" |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
*** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/python2.6: corrupted double-linked list: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
with an associated backtrace and memory dump. I suppose Christopher |
| 28 |
will observe the same on his amd64. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Steve |
Archives