1 |
"Alec Warner" <antarus@g.o> said: |
2 |
> Except some VCS are more usable with different repo layouts; how do |
3 |
> you intend to reconcile these differences? |
4 |
|
5 |
we dont. having a decent VCS now is infinitly more valuable than spending |
6 |
2 years discussing the perfect repo layout. also, switching to a |
7 |
decentralised VCS may/will spawn modes of operation that we dont even |
8 |
know about yet, possibly making the so thoughtful established repo layout |
9 |
changes obsolete faster than the time it took to come up with them. |
10 |
|
11 |
i am not opposed to the idea of layout changes; its just not my personal |
12 |
itch (right now). and quite frankly - i dont see anybody else here, whose |
13 |
itch it is... |
14 |
|
15 |
our current VCS is inhibiting development and innovation. our repo layout |
16 |
is not! |
17 |
|
18 |
absolute worst case is, that we switch again. though that is a risk we |
19 |
still encounter if we do repo layout changes now. |
20 |
|
21 |
best regards |
22 |
Thilo |