1 |
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On that note; anyone on this list doing this sort of |
3 |
> investigation/conversion already, or locked in, guranteed they'll do |
4 |
> it? |
5 |
|
6 |
I plan to give some attention to the verification problem this |
7 |
weekend. It seems like that is considered a concern for moving |
8 |
forward and that there have been problems with the past conversion |
9 |
attempts. I figured I wouldn't look at the conversion process itself |
10 |
until verification was worked out. I will just work off the stale |
11 |
past migration attempts for now (if they have known errors that is all |
12 |
the better). At some point if we get a good verification system then |
13 |
having access to matching pairs of cvs/git repos will obviously be |
14 |
important. I plan to publish whatever I come up with in any case. |
15 |
I'll also take a look at some of the existing tools that were posted |
16 |
on the list - if the consensus is that they're good enough then beyond |
17 |
testing them out and scripting/etc it is problem solved. |
18 |
|
19 |
Rich |