1 |
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:35:05 +0000 |
2 |
"Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:03:24PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
5 |
> > On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 19:12:48 Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
6 |
> > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:20:35PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
7 |
> > > > when i said "settle", i meant "logistics", not "are we doing it" |
8 |
> > > That's why the next paragraph after the one you quoted proposed |
9 |
> > > the use of shortlog. |
10 |
> > so how is this *not* an unresolved issue ? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Regardless of generated changelogs or them being manually written, the |
13 |
> only way that we can ensure that changelogs don't contain any |
14 |
> reordering is by either hand-merging them (then we might as well |
15 |
> hand-write them), or taking snapshots of shortlog changelogs (which |
16 |
> can lead to dupes after some merges). |
17 |
|
18 |
Didn't we want to disallow merges in gx86? |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Best regards, |
22 |
Michał Górny |