Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, gentoo-scm@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 01:11:03
Message-Id: CA+czFiA0sJX_9dYJiOp8rC0jUV56_QG9WtiNamYgHWfPg=YrXw@mail.gmail.com
1 On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
2 > Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC
3 > bots:
4 >
5 > On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200
6 > Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote:
7 >
8 >> On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
9 >> > The irker proxy was mentioned in this thread. I think we should look
10 >> > into this. Unless someone has a better idea.
11 >>
12 >> I think it might be more beneficial to try and relay -commits email to
13 >> irc.
14 >
15 > An IRC bot is nice, but CIA also provided current (!) statistics, which
16 > isn't merely useful in order to boost your own morale/ego/self-esteem,
17 > but also provided up to date information about other developers'
18 > activity, which can help other developers decide if and when to step in
19 > and start (temporarily) maintaining packages that need immediate
20 > attention. ohloh cannot do that for us, presently, and a simple IRC
21 > bot cannot either.
22
23 Bouncing over to -scm list. Maybe this can be implemented in a post-commit hook.
24
25
26 --
27 :wq

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se>