| 1 |
On 19-04-2010 15:13:43 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:21:27 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On 18-04-2010 23:52:34 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > I've did as much as I could without getting more information, and |
| 7 |
> > > turning everything around. What it can is: |
| 8 |
> > > 1) Detect '.git' and enable Thin Manifests (only dirty check), |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > how about we use a file like manifest1_obsolete to switch from fat to |
| 11 |
> > thin? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Well, you are indeed right that the switch should be performed |
| 14 |
> on a better fine-tuned basis as with the current solution, developers |
| 15 |
> would have to manually trick portage into generating full Manifests for |
| 16 |
> their current GIT repositories. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Have you got any suggestions regarding the filename? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
'thin_manifest' to enable usage of the DIST-only Manifest entries? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 25 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives