1 |
On Monday 06 October 2008, Alec Warner wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o> |
3 |
wrote: |
4 |
> > i am not opposed to the idea of layout changes; its just not my |
5 |
> > personal itch (right now). and quite frankly - i dont see anybody |
6 |
> > else here, whose itch it is... |
7 |
> |
8 |
> It is mine ;) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > our current VCS is inhibiting development and innovation. our repo |
11 |
> > layout is not! |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I would say it is (exherbo is a half-decent example of something I |
14 |
> think is better). |
15 |
|
16 |
What problems are we trying to solve? |
17 |
Why is the exherbo approach better? |
18 |
|
19 |
More specific questions: |
20 |
* How fine-grained do you want the repositories to be? |
21 |
* Who controls access? |
22 |
* How is QA being done? |
23 |
* Who defines what is "officially supported" |
24 |
(right now it is "in the tree, not p.masked") |
25 |
* What about global data (the non-cache files in metadata, eclasses)? |
26 |
|
27 |
Robert |