Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-scm@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:07:35
Message-Id: 201108231820.36104.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration by "Robin H. Johnson"
On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 17:26:30 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 03:33:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday, August 22, 2011 15:28:57 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > Unresolved items: > > did we settle on the changelog autogeneration method ? > > No.
when i said "settle", i meant "logistics", not "are we doing it"
> My personal opinion on it is that the ChangeLog isn't auto-generated > because it's NOT the same as the commit messages. The commit messages > are detailed technical info about a commit, while the ChangeLog is a > short version.
funny, as that's the exact reason i gave for omitting changelog entries in the first place. but that ship has sailed, and last i looked, council approved changelog autogeneration in the tree. -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>