Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
To: Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@×××××.com>
Cc: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>, gentoo-scm@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-scm] Converting a recent CVS copy - Item 3: pushing, availability
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:46:13
Message-Id: 20090417174613.GB4195@comet
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-scm] Converting a recent CVS copy - Item 3: pushing, availability by Caleb Cushing
1 On 03:46 Fri 17 Apr , Caleb Cushing wrote:
2 > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
3 > >
4 > > For those of you less familiar with git, this is relevant when you've
5 > > made local commits that haven't been pushed yet. If you pull with no
6 > > options, you get these dumb merge entries in the history
7 >
8 > no offense, if you pull, and you 'know' git. you know what you get.
9 > I'll check out thte --rebase option. hadn't heard of it. I always, git
10 > remote udpate, gt reabase, unless good reason exists.
11
12 Fact is, most people using an SCM aren't deeply familiar with it. They
13 learn enough to work and stop there, unless they've got a lot of time on
14 their hands..
15
16 --
17 Thanks,
18 Donnie
19
20 Donnie Berkholz
21 Developer, Gentoo Linux
22 Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-scm] Converting a recent CVS copy - Item 3: pushing, availability Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@××××××.fm>