Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@×××××.com>
To: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-scm@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-scm] Splitting gentoo-x86 repository for easier consumption
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 07:46:43
Message-Id: 81bfc67a0904120046l442aab71t5e063213576b06eb@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-scm] Splitting gentoo-x86 repository for easier consumption by "Robin H. Johnson"
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
> Generating the Manifest entries for non-DIST bits is trivial, and with > Git, requires zero actual hashing, just extract the data from the Git > index as I say. It's the DIST ones that this is not possible for.
I was unaware that the additional hashes (non sha1) were being dropped. actually, I wasn't referring so much to as not having them around, they'd be stored on the system obviously... as to the point of why they are in the git repo, although perhaps I'm not thinking clearly, wouldn't be the first time. I suppose then the point is as you say to have the dev generate dist before pushing it. which is an aspect I hadn't thought of before suggesting dropping them. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com