1 |
On 08/23/2011 07:02 AM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: |
2 |
> Ok. What is problems with thin Manifests (some kind of this already |
3 |
> implented in funtoo) |
4 |
|
5 |
This is really easy to do. Like the manifest1 -> manifest2 migration, |
6 |
we'll need some kind of repository marker which indicates the manifest |
7 |
format. For example, we could use an entry in metadata/layout.conf for |
8 |
this purpose (as I've already suggested in bug #333691). |
9 |
|
10 |
> and commit signing (this means gpg signing or something else?). |
11 |
|
12 |
I guess the existing manifest signing technique is likely to trigger |
13 |
merge conflicts in the manifests. I suppose we could use another marker, |
14 |
similar to the thin manifest marker, to indicate that the existing |
15 |
manifest signing technique should not be used in the git tree. |
16 |
-- |
17 |
Thanks, |
18 |
Zac |