| 1 |
Le 04/10/2014 02:00, Rich Freeman a écrit : |
| 2 |
> Rationale: |
| 3 |
[…] |
| 4 |
6. We've been (collectively) working with CVS history for more than a |
| 5 |
decade now and that hasn't been a major issue (AFAICT). Maybe a |
| 6 |
hindrance at times, but hardly more than that. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
In fact, is there a compelling reason to convert history to git? Can't |
| 9 |
it just stay as a read-only CVS repo with webcvs? Or are we doing the |
| 10 |
conversion for infra purposes (ie, stop the CVS service/maintenance |
| 11 |
altogether)? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
In any case, +1 for handling history separately, I know I won't mind |
| 14 |
having to look elsewhere if I need it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Cheers, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Rémi |
Archives