1 |
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:57:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> On 08/23/2011 07:02 AM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: |
3 |
>> Ok. What is problems with thin Manifests (some kind of this already |
4 |
>> implented in funtoo) |
5 |
> |
6 |
> This is really easy to do. Like the manifest1 -> manifest2 migration, |
7 |
> we'll need some kind of repository marker which indicates the |
8 |
> manifest |
9 |
> format. For example, we could use an entry in metadata/layout.conf |
10 |
> for |
11 |
> this purpose (as I've already suggested in bug #333691). |
12 |
> |
13 |
>> and commit signing (this means gpg signing or something else?). |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I guess the existing manifest signing technique is likely to trigger |
16 |
> merge conflicts in the manifests. I suppose we could use another |
17 |
> marker, |
18 |
> similar to the thin manifest marker, to indicate that the existing |
19 |
> manifest signing technique should not be used in the git tree. |
20 |
|
21 |
Yep signing git commits with gpg should avoid conflicts. May we can use |
22 |
something like this [1] |
23 |
[1] |
24 |
http://weierophinney.net/matthew/archives/236-GPG-signing-Git-Commits.html |
25 |
-- |
26 |
Best Regards, |
27 |
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov |
28 |
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia |
29 |
Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics |
30 |
Gentoo Team Ru |
31 |
Gentoo Linux Dev |
32 |
mailto:alexxyum@×××××.com |
33 |
mailto:alexxy@g.o |
34 |
mailto:alexxy@×××××××××××××.ru |