Gentoo Archives: gentoo-scm

From: Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o>
To: gentoo-scm@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:05:42
Message-Id: 24c93757267031f12741b2347f38e93e@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration by Zac Medico
1 On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:57:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
2 > On 08/23/2011 07:02 AM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
3 >> Ok. What is problems with thin Manifests (some kind of this already
4 >> implented in funtoo)
5 >
6 > This is really easy to do. Like the manifest1 -> manifest2 migration,
7 > we'll need some kind of repository marker which indicates the
8 > manifest
9 > format. For example, we could use an entry in metadata/layout.conf
10 > for
11 > this purpose (as I've already suggested in bug #333691).
12 >
13 >> and commit signing (this means gpg signing or something else?).
14 >
15 > I guess the existing manifest signing technique is likely to trigger
16 > merge conflicts in the manifests. I suppose we could use another
17 > marker,
18 > similar to the thin manifest marker, to indicate that the existing
19 > manifest signing technique should not be used in the git tree.
20
21 Yep signing git commits with gpg should avoid conflicts. May we can use
22 something like this [1]
23 [1]
24 http://weierophinney.net/matthew/archives/236-GPG-signing-Git-Commits.html
25 --
26 Best Regards,
27 Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
28 Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia
29 Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
30 Gentoo Team Ru
31 Gentoo Linux Dev
32 mailto:alexxyum@×××××.com
33 mailto:alexxy@g.o
34 mailto:alexxy@×××××××××××××.ru

Replies