| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Hiya guys, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
So what's the current state of things? Apparently[1] portage is now |
| 7 |
capable of having not only a git repo to commit to, but actually using |
| 8 |
git as the primary repo for users (rather than using rsync). Great work |
| 9 |
Zac, thanks! |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Do we have a plan for keeping this moving? What things are we lacking |
| 12 |
at the moment that mean we're not ready to establish a testing |
| 13 |
environment? If we've got repoman support, and we've got portage |
| 14 |
support, presumably it's just the bits in the middle (server-side |
| 15 |
metadata generation, QA tests?) that need doing? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I'm glad that we're making progress (Daniel seems to be pushing this, |
| 18 |
which is good), but I'd like to know what tasks we internally have left |
| 19 |
to consider, and put together a list of all the things we need to do to |
| 20 |
proceed. Once we've got that people will be able to pick things they |
| 21 |
can help with and we might get the ball moving a bit faster. Thanks... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Mike 5:) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
[1] http://blog.funtoo.org/2009/01/portage-is-now-git-friendly.html |
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkl5qGUACgkQu7rWomwgFXp1cACdGEbOsVaf4CFz49VK/xcIciQK |
| 30 |
8B4AnAwi/twwKy3DSlQulA2ieSxzzk/4 |
| 31 |
=VB5y |
| 32 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives