On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:35:05 +0000
"Robin H. Johnson" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:03:24PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 19:12:48 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:20:35PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > when i said "settle", i meant "logistics", not "are we doing it"
> > > That's why the next paragraph after the one you quoted proposed
> > > the use of shortlog.
> > so how is this *not* an unresolved issue ?
> Regardless of generated changelogs or them being manually written, the
> only way that we can ensure that changelogs don't contain any
> reordering is by either hand-merging them (then we might as well
> hand-write them), or taking snapshots of shortlog changelogs (which
> can lead to dupes after some merges).
Didn't we want to disallow merges in gx86?