List Archive: gentoo-scm
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Monday 06 October 2008, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Thilo Bangert <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > i am not opposed to the idea of layout changes; its just not my
> > personal itch (right now). and quite frankly - i dont see anybody
> > else here, whose itch it is...
> It is mine ;)
> > our current VCS is inhibiting development and innovation. our repo
> > layout is not!
> I would say it is (exherbo is a half-decent example of something I
> think is better).
What problems are we trying to solve?
Why is the exherbo approach better?
More specific questions:
* How fine-grained do you want the repositories to be?
* Who controls access?
* How is QA being done?
* Who defines what is "officially supported"
(right now it is "in the tree, not p.masked")
* What about global data (the non-cache files in metadata, eclasses)?
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)