Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Monday 06 October 2008, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o>
wrote:
> > i am not opposed to the idea of layout changes; its just not my
> > personal itch (right now). and quite frankly - i dont see anybody
> > else here, whose itch it is...
>
> It is mine ;)
>
> > our current VCS is inhibiting development and innovation. our repo
> > layout is not!
>
> I would say it is (exherbo is a half-decent example of something I
> think is better).
What problems are we trying to solve?
Why is the exherbo approach better?
More specific questions:
* How fine-grained do you want the repositories to be?
* Who controls access?
* How is QA being done?
* Who defines what is "officially supported"
(right now it is "in the tree, not p.masked")
* What about global data (the non-cache files in metadata, eclasses)?
Robert
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
|
|
