On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 17:26:30 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 03:33:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday, August 22, 2011 15:28:57 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > Unresolved items:
> > did we settle on the changelog autogeneration method ?
> 
> No.

when i said "settle", i meant "logistics", not "are we doing it"

> My personal opinion on it is that the ChangeLog isn't auto-generated
> because it's NOT the same as the commit messages. The commit messages
> are detailed technical info about a commit, while the ChangeLog is a
> short version.

funny, as that's the exact reason i gave for omitting changelog entries in the 
first place.  but that ship has sailed, and last i looked, council approved 
changelog autogeneration in the tree.
-mike