1 |
On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 17:26:30 Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 03:33:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > On Monday, August 22, 2011 15:28:57 Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
4 |
> > > Unresolved items: |
5 |
> > did we settle on the changelog autogeneration method ? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> No. |
8 |
|
9 |
when i said "settle", i meant "logistics", not "are we doing it" |
10 |
|
11 |
> My personal opinion on it is that the ChangeLog isn't auto-generated |
12 |
> because it's NOT the same as the commit messages. The commit messages |
13 |
> are detailed technical info about a commit, while the ChangeLog is a |
14 |
> short version. |
15 |
|
16 |
funny, as that's the exact reason i gave for omitting changelog entries in the |
17 |
first place. but that ship has sailed, and last i looked, council approved |
18 |
changelog autogeneration in the tree. |
19 |
-mike |