Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-scm
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-scm: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-scm@g.o
From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:57:24 -0700
On 08/23/2011 07:02 AM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
> Ok. What is problems with thin Manifests (some kind of this already
> implented in funtoo)

This is really easy to do. Like the manifest1 -> manifest2 migration,
we'll need some kind of repository marker which indicates the manifest
format. For example, we could use an entry in metadata/layout.conf for
this purpose (as I've already suggested in bug #333691).

> and commit signing (this means gpg signing or something else?).

I guess the existing manifest signing technique is likely to trigger
merge conflicts in the manifests. I suppose we could use another marker,
similar to the thin manifest marker, to indicate that the existing
manifest signing technique should not be used in the git tree.
-- 
Thanks,
Zac


Replies:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration
-- Alexey Shvetsov
References:
Progress on cvs->git migration
-- Alexey Shvetsov
Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration
-- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration
-- Alexey Shvetsov
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-scm: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration
Previous by date:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration
Next by date:
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress on cvs->git migration


Updated May 23, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-scm mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.