Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:28:57 +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:28:29PM +0400, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
>> Is there any progress since last update on cvs->git migration?
> The list for it is gentoo-scm, not gentoo-dev.
>
> There's an experimental tree that mirrors CVS:
>
> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary
>
> Unresolved items:
> - commit signing
> - thin Manifests
> - merge policies
>
> In terms of the tree size question, we were going to produce a
> zero-history point at the switchover time, and offer a graftable pack
> with all prior history. This got the initial packfile down under
> 80MiB
> (with the historical packfile being ~900MiB).
Ok. What is problems with thin Manifests (some kind of this already
implented in funtoo) and commit signing (this means gpg signing or
something else?).
--
Best Regards,
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia
Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
Gentoo Team Ru
Gentoo Linux Dev
mailto:alexxyum@...
mailto:alexxy@g.o
mailto:alexxy@...
|
|
