On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:57:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 08/23/2011 07:02 AM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
>> Ok. What is problems with thin Manifests (some kind of this already
>> implented in funtoo)
>
> This is really easy to do. Like the manifest1 -> manifest2 migration,
> we'll need some kind of repository marker which indicates the 
> manifest
> format. For example, we could use an entry in metadata/layout.conf 
> for
> this purpose (as I've already suggested in bug #333691).
>
>> and commit signing (this means gpg signing or something else?).
>
> I guess the existing manifest signing technique is likely to trigger
> merge conflicts in the manifests. I suppose we could use another 
> marker,
> similar to the thin manifest marker, to indicate that the existing
> manifest signing technique should not be used in the git tree.

Yep signing git commits with gpg should avoid conflicts. May we can use 
something like this [1]
[1] 
http://weierophinney.net/matthew/archives/236-GPG-signing-Git-Commits.html
-- 
Best Regards,
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia
Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
Gentoo Team Ru
Gentoo Linux Dev
mailto:alexxyum@...
mailto:alexxy@g.o
mailto:alexxy@...