List Archive: gentoo-scm
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Or may be something like this according to old disscussion
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:19:31 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:22:06 +0400
> Alexey Shvetsov <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:57:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
>> > On 08/23/2011 07:02 AM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
>> >> Ok. What is problems with thin Manifests (some kind of this
>> >> implented in funtoo)
>> > This is really easy to do. Like the manifest1 -> manifest2
>> > migration, we'll need some kind of repository marker which
>> > indicates the manifest
>> > format. For example, we could use an entry in metadata/layout.conf
>> > for
>> > this purpose (as I've already suggested in bug #333691).
>> >> and commit signing (this means gpg signing or something else?).
>> > I guess the existing manifest signing technique is likely to
>> > merge conflicts in the manifests. I suppose we could use another
>> > marker,
>> > similar to the thin manifest marker, to indicate that the existing
>> > manifest signing technique should not be used in the git tree.
>> Yep signing git commits with gpg should avoid conflicts. May we can
>> use something like this 
> Er, no. Signing commits != signing commit message text.
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia
Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
Gentoo Team Ru
Gentoo Linux Dev