Archives
Archives
| From: | Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-scm@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-scm] meeting followup: repo layout | ||
| Date: | Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:44:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | AANLkTimSjm2u=e_bxzNX5UevQe2DWMEsPSL_-FfoHnhT@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-scm] meeting followup: repo layout by "Robin H. Johnson" |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:34, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > For comparison, what would the overhead costs of hg be above? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Mercurial would be about O(f + d + 10r). But wouldn't the real git |
| 5 | inode space be O(35r) directly after repacking, but grow O(rev) until |
| 6 | the next repack? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Cheers, |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Dirkjan |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-scm] meeting followup: repo layout | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> |