1 |
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 12:47, David Olsen wrote: |
2 |
> On 2003-12-16 at 15:25:09, James Dennis <james@×××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > This whole discussion is getting ridiculous. |
4 |
|
5 |
I agree here... |
6 |
|
7 |
> The point was traceroute is _not_ installed by default. An admin desiring to |
8 |
> install this software, in my case, on several hundred servers, I don't want |
9 |
> to have to chmod traceroute on all those boxes, everytime there's an update |
10 |
> to traceoute because of what could be deemed a poor choice for security. |
11 |
|
12 |
Use cfengine as pointed out earlier, or write a script to do this... |
13 |
This is not really a big issue. |
14 |
|
15 |
> If enough of the community wants it back the way it was, I assume Gentoo developers will |
16 |
> respond as such. |
17 |
|
18 |
Seems like this is not the case here. |
19 |
|
20 |
--ras |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |