| 1 |
cfengine looks like a good solution. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Part of the problem is that this was not done publicly. Some people did not |
| 4 |
discover the change until tcpdump suddenly stopped working. (No flames |
| 5 |
about not reading the changelogs, please.) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
michael |
| 8 |
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:03:40 -0800 |
| 9 |
Jesse <ras1@××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 12:47, David Olsen wrote: |
| 12 |
> > On 2003-12-16 at 15:25:09, James Dennis <james@×××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 13 |
> > > This whole discussion is getting ridiculous. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I agree here... |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> > The point was traceroute is _not_ installed by default. An admin |
| 18 |
> > desiring to install this software, in my case, on several hundred |
| 19 |
> > servers, I don't want to have to chmod traceroute on all those boxes, |
| 20 |
> > everytime there's an update to traceoute because of what could be deemed |
| 21 |
> > a poor choice for security. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Use cfengine as pointed out earlier, or write a script to do this... |
| 24 |
> This is not really a big issue. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> > If enough of the community wants it back the way it was, I assume Gentoo |
| 27 |
> > developers will respond as such. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Seems like this is not the case here. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> --ras |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> -- |
| 37 |
> gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
---- ---- ---- |
| 42 |
Michael Reilly michaelr@×××××.com |
| 43 |
Cisco Systems, Santa Cruz, CA |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Archives