1 |
Video and sensor logs are definitely great when available, but there are |
2 |
plenty of companies without such precautions, besides the home user who |
3 |
seldom has them. It is tricky to seal/mark a case in some way that an |
4 |
intruder could not falsify. |
5 |
|
6 |
I agree both of these are good measures, but neither amounts to |
7 |
verifying the physical security of the hardware. |
8 |
|
9 |
~RMC |
10 |
|
11 |
Oliver Schad wrote: |
12 |
> Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 16:20 schrieb mir Richard M. Conlan: |
13 |
>> And how does one realistically check the physical integrity of their |
14 |
>> hardware? o_O That seems a herculean task for all but the most |
15 |
>> hardcore computer engineer. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Every computer centre has a alarm system for physical intruders - a |
18 |
> check of videos and sensor logs can give you surety. You can mark your |
19 |
> hardware additionally with - I don't know the english word - signs(?) |
20 |
> which breaks if someone manpipulates your hardware. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Regards |
23 |
> Oli |
24 |
> |
25 |
-- |
26 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |