Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons)
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:09:46
Message-Id: 200509142104.34235.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons) by Brian Harring
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 18:30, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:24:25PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 September 2005 11:39, Andrej Kacian wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:22:43 +0200 > > > > > > Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: > > > > If you put gentoo onto such a box, it is your very own problem. If > > > > you want total stability and a lot of testing prior a patch goes out, > > > > maybe you should spent the bucks and buy SLES or RHEL > > > > If something breaks with them, you have a right to whine. > > > > > > That doesn't mean you should sit quietly and smile when you get hit by > > > a bug in a free distro. > > > > no, but you should also not start demanding things and blame others. > > > > If you put gentoo onto a production box, you should be very sure that you > > are able to solve your problems. > > How is this related to security? > ~harring
how is this whole thread related to security? -- gentoo-security@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-security] org-x11 GLSA 200509-07. Is bug #96053 fixed in -r3? (black icons) William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au>