| 1 |
Joe Knall wrote: |
| 2 |
> When I get you right, you mean the P in Lamp makes these limitations |
| 3 |
> (ro, noexec, nodev, chroot ...) nonsense. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
only the noexec is defeated from scripts, ro nodev chrooting are |
| 6 |
obviously safe from this |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
..but.. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
noexec on linux is futile since you could use /lib/ld-linux.so to exec |
| 11 |
bins on a noexec mount point |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
if you make ld-linux.so -x then you have to rebuild all binaries |
| 14 |
statically linked : ) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
..so.. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
it's better to get some acl/rbac system like grsec+pax and (rsbac or |
| 19 |
selinux) to get sure things happens right |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
yes, it could be some time expensive to write/adapt the rules to your |
| 22 |
current system but it worth the effort |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
regards, |
| 25 |
Francesco 'ascii' Ongaro |
| 26 |
http://www.ush.it/ |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Archives