| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Callan K L Tham wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004-06-11_kernel_crash/index.html |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> It wasn't the entire gentoo-sources tree that isn't affected, but only |
| 9 |
> 2.4.26-rc3-gentoo, 2.4.26_pre6-gentoo and 2.4.25-gentoo-r1. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> From the article: "It is unclear why these specific Gentoo patch sets |
| 12 |
> of the 2.4.26 kernel are safe. Other versions of the Gentoo kernel are |
| 13 |
> not." |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> So I guess we do need a GLSA for it... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Latest sources (for 99% kernel sources) in portage are patched and safe. |
| 18 |
A GLSA will soon be out. Stay tuned. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- -K |
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iD8DBQFA1+fhvcL1obalX08RAgWjAJ482Ubm5bnAG7JwIoZ6O4v+IuJlWACffKo7 |
| 26 |
Lw5gN48bIUuDVYWvt56cR4w= |
| 27 |
=gg31 |
| 28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Archives