Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-security
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-security: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: "Peter Simons" <simons@...>
From: "Jake Hawkes" <jake@...>
Subject: Re: Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:11:11 -0700 (MST)
Peter Simons said:
> Anthony Gorecki writes:
>
>  > Not to mention wireless data injection attacks, for
>  > anyone running a wireless connection on their system.
>
> And let's not forget the added bonus that because Gentoo
> builds everything from the source code, the attack is
> completely platform independent and works nicely on x86,
> AMD, PowerPC, and whatnot else.
>
> Great job.
>

You, with caustic replies like that, you're not going to motivate anyone.



--
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list

References:
Trojan for Gentoo, part 2
-- Alexander Holler
Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?)
-- Kurt Lieber
Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?)
-- Peter Simons
Re: Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?)
-- Anthony Gorecki
Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?)
-- Peter Simons
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-security: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?)
Next by thread:
Re: Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?)
Previous by date:
Re: *****SPAM***** Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Let's blow the whistle
Next by date:
Re: Re: Let's blow the whistle


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-security mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.