1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
JHolder wrote: |
7 |
| John Richard Moser said: |
8 |
| [snip] |
9 |
| |
10 |
|>JHolder wrote: |
11 |
|>| John Richard Moser said: |
12 |
|>| [snip] |
13 |
|>| |
14 |
|>|>It's no secret that -fstack-protector-all breaks some programs that |
15 |
|>|>- -fstack-protector doesn't (i.e. Firefox, Thunderbird, Mozilla). In |
16 |
| |
17 |
| [snip] |
18 |
| |
19 |
|>| |
20 |
|>| Just out of curiousity, does anyone know if using libsafe |
21 |
|>| (http://www.research.avayalabs.com/project/libsafe/) would tend to break |
22 |
|>| programs? |
23 |
|> |
24 |
|>According to http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/node5.html , |
25 |
|>libsafe has greater overhead. |
26 |
|> |
27 |
| |
28 |
| |
29 |
| Good answer. Embarrassingly enough, your answer sounds like you spent 30 |
30 |
| seconds with google. Something, which by all rights I should have done |
31 |
| myself. But as I am supposed to be working right now ;-) I appreciate |
32 |
| your time for doing the research on my odd musings. |
33 |
| |
34 |
|
35 |
I came accross this stuff a while back, I had 'em on hand. |
36 |
|
37 |
Found 'em with google after 4 or 5 searches trying to determine how the |
38 |
heck old SSP was. |
39 |
|
40 |
| John |
41 |
| |
42 |
| -- |
43 |
| gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
44 |
| |
45 |
| |
46 |
|
47 |
- -- |
48 |
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the |
49 |
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated. |
50 |
|
51 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
52 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) |
53 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
54 |
|
55 |
iD8DBQFBUl+rhDd4aOud5P8RAqWwAJ9boVfdlXPLvOBwnJdeVBsuN97ysQCeIA8G |
56 |
3SMVo/yU8JAvc66V3x9EhUs= |
57 |
=3z4S |
58 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
59 |
|
60 |
-- |
61 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |