From: | Peter Simons <simons@××××.to> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-security@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-security] Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?) | ||
Date: | Mon, 08 Nov 2004 01:19:01 | ||
Message-Id: | 87r7n5qgt2.fsf@peti.cryp.to | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-security] Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?) by Anthony Gorecki |
1 | Anthony Gorecki writes: |
2 | |
3 | > Not to mention wireless data injection attacks, for |
4 | > anyone running a wireless connection on their system. |
5 | |
6 | And let's not forget the added bonus that because Gentoo |
7 | builds everything from the source code, the attack is |
8 | completely platform independent and works nicely on x86, |
9 | AMD, PowerPC, and whatnot else. |
10 | |
11 | Great job. |
12 | |
13 | Peter |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-security] Re: No, apparently not. (was: Is anybody else worried about this?) | Jake Hawkes <jake@×××××××××××××××.net> |