From: | dante <dante@×××××××××××××××.net> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-security@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-security] Cryptsetup-LUKS: cryptsetup -c anycipher-xts-plain:sha256 or not :sha256? | ||
Date: | Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:16:15 | ||
Message-Id: | 47DD1D5E.80106@virtualblueness.net | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-security] Cryptsetup-LUKS: cryptsetup -c anycipher-xts-plain:sha256 or not :sha256? by jehovah@wir-sind-cool.org |
1 | jehovah@×××××××××××××.org wrote: |
2 | > Hi, |
3 | > |
4 | > I found many guides on harddisk encryption with cryptsetup-LUKS but none of them clarifies if it makes sense to use a hash-function (like sha256) with xts-plain. I would appreciate any hint. |
5 | > |
6 | > Best, |
7 | > Jehovah |
8 | > |
9 | There are two wikipedia articles which explain disk encryption theory in |
10 | general: |
11 | |
12 | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_encryption_theory |
13 | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_cipher_modes_of_operation |
14 | |
15 | The latter is particularly good and illustrates the problem with naive |
16 | ECB mode using pictures. |
17 | |
18 | I hope this helps |
19 | |
20 | --Tony |
21 | |
22 | -- |
23 | gentoo-security@l.g.o mailing list |