| 1 |
Hi! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 4 |
> > The entire contents of /usr/portage is not authenticated. |
| 5 |
> > All the manifest files, all the patches, all the ebuilds are |
| 6 |
> > obtained through a public network without _any_ form of |
| 7 |
> > authentication. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> That is factually incorrect. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Pick any Gentoo machine that has a reasonably recent portage tree and do |
| 12 |
> any of the following: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> cat /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/Manifest |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
This does not contain a GPG signature here. Of all packages... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> cat /usr/portage/app-editors/vim/Manifest |
| 19 |
> cat /usr/portage/dev-lang/perl/Manifest |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I've run a script across the entire tree, collecting 43 different |
| 22 |
signature keys IDs from Manifest files in all (from a total of |
| 23 |
2074 signed Manifest files, making up about 1/4). Of those keys, |
| 24 |
16 were unavailable on the Subkeys Public Key Network (listed |
| 25 |
below). Where can I get those? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
0x012E7061 |
| 28 |
0x1E37DA76 |
| 29 |
0x2D86E6F4 |
| 30 |
0x3526BFED |
| 31 |
0x8256272E |
| 32 |
0x8F01B50A |
| 33 |
0x96E7B687 |
| 34 |
0xAD8D10B6 |
| 35 |
0xAF09E289 |
| 36 |
0xB0FAE1C1 |
| 37 |
0xBC58B271 |
| 38 |
0xC4BBD87A |
| 39 |
0xCA9EC979 |
| 40 |
0xE95F7581 |
| 41 |
0xEB0E2EF7 |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Wondering, |
| 44 |
Tobias |
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
export DISPLAY=vt100 |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |
Archives