Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Chris Frey <cdfrey@×××××××××.ca>
To: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-security] Re: Re: Re: Re: Gentoo TOTALLY secure now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 05:45:46
Message-Id: 20041112004522.B17065@netdirect.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] Re: Re: Re: Gentoo TOTALLY secure now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by Paul de Vrieze
1 On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:56:52PM +0100, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
2 > On Thursday 11 November 2004 19:49, Chris Frey wrote:
3 > > In another post, you asked whether we expect the devs to drop everything to
4 > > implement the checking in emerge sync. I certainly don't expect that.
5 > > Once the signatures are available from the server, any user can use them
6 > > and write their own code to do the checks. The signature is all we need.
7 >
8 > Unfortunately this is not true. There are a number of requirements for the
9 > solution that is finally implemented. Most of the problems are
10 > organizatorial, not technical:
11
12 I realize these problems still need to be solved in the official solution,
13 but that is not what I was referring to.
14
15 In order to verify that the tree we download today is the one from the main
16 gentoo server, all we need is the patch Peter posted.
17
18 I'm eagerly awaiting the official solution too, but the current patch in
19 question looks simple enough to be implemented in the interim.
20
21 - Chris
22
23
24 --
25 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list