List Archive: gentoo-security
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Friday 26 August 2011 18:12:00 Christian Kauhaus wrote:
> I'm wondering that may favorite Linux distro hasn't had any security
> announcements since January. In my opinion this is really problematic. At
> our company we try to convince prospective customers to host their
> applications on our Gentoo servers. When asked about security incident
> handling, I have to say: "They state 'Security is a primary focus' on their
> website, but they don't inform their users." Not very convincing.
That's the issue with an all-volunteer team. We lost some active members and
with that quite some momentum. The remainder of the team currently focuses on
getting issues fixed, which actually works quite well. Users who are watching
our alias in Bugzilla were informed about all updates.
Making advisories with the available tool and process set was very time-
intensive, I've been working on making that drafting process faster. The goal
we currently have is to wrap up the pending advisories in September with a few
large grouped advisories and resume sending advisories after that as usual.
Compared to other distributions, our advisories have been rather detailed with
lots of manually researched information. I'm not sure if we can keep up this
very high standard with the limited manpower, but we'll try our best.
For quite some time now, there has also been a staffing request on the
website, with low-to-medium success (yielding 1 new team member). Most people
interested didn't think the job came with that much boring work. (No, we're
not hacking stuff all day)
> So what is the roadblock that hinders GLSA creation? Is there any way to get
> the GLSAs into working order again?
tl;dr: Get more people to do boring work.
Alex Legler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Gentoo Security / Ruby
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)