Gentoo Archives: gentoo-security

From: Ben Anderson <ben@××××××××××××××××××.au>
To: gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-security] US-CERT Technical Cyber Security Alert TA06-208A -- Mozilla Products Contain Multiple Vulnerabilities (fwd)
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:59:51
Message-Id: 44CD549C.80505@ormond.unimelb.edu.au
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-security] US-CERT Technical Cyber Security Alert TA06-208A -- Mozilla Products Contain Multiple Vulnerabilities (fwd) by Wes Young
1 http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Install_Oracle_10g
2
3 Anyone know if there's anything we could do to encourage Oracle to
4 support Gentoo as an install platform?
5
6 Ben.
7
8 Wes Young wrote:
9 > On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:17 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
10 >> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Dan Noe wrote:
11 >>
12 >>> If that isn't acceptable to you, you should seriously consider using a
13 >>> commercial distribution where people *are* paid to fix security bugs.
14 >
15 > ...
16 >
17 >> Having spent the last month trying to put together a reasonably
18 >> minimalistic install of Red Hat Enterprise Linux for an Oracle project, let
19 >> me tell you that while they might fix bugs quickly, working with it is a
20 >> pain in the ass, particularly compared to the simplicity and flexibility
21 >> that is Gentoo. (you have to love wanting to install package A, which has a
22 >> dependency on package B you don't even care about, but can't get rid of,
23 >> and that dependency cascades into a dozen more packages you want nothing to
24 >> do with that have to install just to get package A <sigh>...)
25 >>
26 >
27 > I second this, I just finished a rather larger (highly dependency
28 > driven) RHEL oracle install and it just re-enforced to me how much
29 > gentoo is just plain awesome. There is really no other way to describe
30 > it.
31 >
32 > $gentoo++;
33 >
34 > Thanks guys!
35 --
36 gentoo-security@g.o mailing list