Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-security
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-security: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: <gentoo-security@g.o>
From: "Brian Klauss" <brklauss@...>
Subject: Thoughts on Package Security
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:20:03 -0700
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Why not take package security one step deeper to 
ensure the validity of every ebuild and source-tree?&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Instead of relying upon a master hash of the 
compressed package, create a hash for each source file, documentation, makefile, 
etc., and as part of the emerge process, the application validates the 
compressed hash, then looks at each decompressed file and compares the hash 
value of it against a master repository.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Once everything checks out, we then guarantee that 
the compressed package and all related source files are true to the source as it 
was created since the master hash tables are contained in the master repository 
instead of within the compressed file (which can be altered).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Just an idea, and if I am way off, let me 
know.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Brian...</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
Replies:
Re: Thoughts on Package Security
-- guerrilla_thought
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-security: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
mit-krb5, pam_krb5 and gcc3.3.2
Next by thread:
Re: Thoughts on Package Security
Previous by date:
Re: Idea for easily checking for security updates.
Next by date:
Re: Thoughts on Package Security


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-security mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.