Archives
Archives
| From: | BarrySchwartz124@×××××××.net | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-security@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-security] OT: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons | ||
| Date: | Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:38:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20040923153737.GA4711@crud.crud.mn.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-security] OT: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons by JHolder |
||
| 1 | JHolder <trs-gml@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > Just out of curiousity, does anyone know if using libsafe |
| 3 | > (http://www.research.avayalabs.com/project/libsafe/) would tend to break |
| 4 | > programs? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | There's a better reason, however, not to use libsafe than just any |
| 7 | technical inferiority: libsafe currently is tied to an architecture. |
| 8 | It works fine on x86, but not on amd64 or probably anything else. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | gentoo-security@g.o mailing list |