Alright how do we proceed to get this team started.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Ned Ludd <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 13:59 -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> > On Sunday 17 February 2008 23:12:35 Robert Buchholz wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 17. February 2008, Eduardo Tongson wrote:
> > > > What specific kernel knowledge is needed to get a Kernel advisory up
> > > > and running ?
> > >
> > > Between becoming aware of a vulnerability in Linux and drafting an advisory
> > > for one or all kernel sources comes the part where you review which
> > > versions of which kernel sources are affected and unaffected. You also
> > > need to pay attention to specifics of the added patchsets, which might
> > > duplicate vulnerabilities.
> > >
> > > Parts of the job can indeed be done without Kernel and C knowledge, but
> > > some cannot. So if we draft a new kernel security *team*, people without C
> > > and kernel knowledge are helpful -- some others need to have it, though.
> > >
> > > Robert
> > To be honest, 99% of what is done in the kernel security team can be done with
> > no C knowledge at all.
> > I'm not an expert C person - far from it - but I eventually became the head of
> > Kernel Security until I retired a few months ago.
> > Most of it is bug handling. The major problem is a social, not a technical
> > one. Because of the manner in which our kernels are organized, a single
> > vulnerability involves checking upstream version numbers, coordinating them
> > into our downstream version numbers for all sources, checking to see if the
> > sources are effected, figuring out who to CC for the bugs, then harassing
> > them until they do it.
> > Unlike other security sources, any attempt to hardmask the package is shutdown
> > instantly. The chaos that would result from a kernel hardmask, even one of
> > the lesser used ones, caused me to only successfully order one over my entire
> > career in Gentoo Kernsec... even though more around 30 would have been
> > needed. It is not infrequently that bugs will last six months without any
> > action coming about them, and users are blissfully unaware.
> > I am happy to give my input as the former head of Kernel Security, but it is
> > my personal opinion that any advances in kernel security will require the
> > full cooperation of security, and letting the head of kernel security be able
> > to actually enforce threats, as that seems to be the only way bugs ever get
> > resolved. Pleading didn't work - I tried.
> > -Harlan Lieberman-Berg
> > Gentoo Developer Emeritus
> Every word of what you said is painfully true. The only way to
> accomplish this would be with an Iron Fist(fail) or a team of ~15 guys
> who do nothing but patch and push new kernels and the PR that goes along
> with them every few days.
> Ned Ludd <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> email@example.com mailing list
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list