Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-security
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-security: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-security@g.o
From: Heikki Levanto <heikki@...>
Subject: Re: Thoughts on Package Security
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:01:02 +0100
On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 22:20, Brian Klauss wrote:
> Why not take package security one step deeper to ensure the validity
> of every ebuild and source-tree?  
>  
> Instead of relying upon a master hash of the compressed package,
> create a hash for each source file, documentation, makefile, etc.

Sorry, I don't see what that would give. If the md5 of the compressed
archive is fine, then we know already that it has not been tampered
with. Ergo, all contained files are fine.

(except for the theoretical possibility of md5-sum collision, which is
unlikely to an astronomical degree, and not worth worrying about in real
world)

Heikki

-- 
Heikki Levanto  LSD - Levanto Software Development   <heikki@...>


--
gentoo-security@g.o mailing list

Replies:
Re: Thoughts on Package Security
-- Brian Klauss
References:
Thoughts on Package Security
-- Brian Klauss
Re: Thoughts on Package Security
-- guerrilla_thought
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-security: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Thoughts on Package Security
Next by thread:
Re: Thoughts on Package Security
Previous by date:
Re: Thoughts on Package Security
Next by date:
Security concerns and portage versioning


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-security mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.