| 1 |
On 11:11 Mon 21 Jun , Mark Guertin wrote: |
| 2 |
> From one of the articles I read it showed that the gentoo-sources |
| 3 |
> weren't affected... but I don't have the url handy. It was someone |
| 4 |
> that went through all kinds of distro's 'default' kernels. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Mark |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004-06-11_kernel_crash/index.html |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
It wasn't the entire gentoo-sources tree that isn't affected, but only |
| 11 |
2.4.26-rc3-gentoo, 2.4.26_pre6-gentoo and 2.4.25-gentoo-r1. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
From the article: "It is unclear why these specific Gentoo patch sets |
| 14 |
of the 2.4.26 kernel are safe. Other versions of the Gentoo kernel are |
| 15 |
not." |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So I guess we do need a GLSA for it... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Callan |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to |
| 22 |
the death your right to say it." -- Beatrice Hall |
Archives