1 |
I would like to help as well. I have limited C experience unfortunately, |
2 |
and most of that is programming PIC microcontrollers. Been using Gentoo for |
3 |
years, and would love to give something back. |
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
Robert |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:34 AM, George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com> wrote: |
10 |
|
11 |
> Im interested, no C knowledge but plenty of time, passed the dev exam |
12 |
> and a willingness to learn. It's been on my agenda for a long time. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> nick loeve wrote: |
15 |
> > I can help also... i have limited free time but am willing to put in |
16 |
> > some hours... |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > I have medium C knowledge, reasonable kernel experience, and also a |
19 |
> > strong linux background |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Arthur Bispo de Castro |
22 |
> > <arthur@××××××××××××××.br> wrote: |
23 |
> >> I'm interested... little C knowledge, very curious about kernel, strong |
24 |
> >> linux background... |
25 |
> >> |
26 |
> >> is there another prereq to join this? |
27 |
> >> |
28 |
> >> |
29 |
> >> |
30 |
> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:20:02AM -0200, Juan Pablo Olivera wrote: |
31 |
> >> > I am interested too :) |
32 |
> >> > |
33 |
> >> > No C knowledge but strong linux background and very organized guy. |
34 |
> >> > |
35 |
> >> > On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 01:05 -0500, Casey Link wrote: |
36 |
> >> > > It would probably help if we knew how many people were interested. |
37 |
> >> > > |
38 |
> >> > > I am. +1 |
39 |
> >> > > |
40 |
> >> > > Casey |
41 |
> >> > > |
42 |
> >> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Eduardo Tongson < |
43 |
> propolice@×××××.com> wrote: |
44 |
> >> > > > Alright how do we proceed to get this team started. |
45 |
> >> > > > |
46 |
> >> > > > ed*eonsec |
47 |
> >> > > > |
48 |
> >> > > > |
49 |
> >> > > > |
50 |
> >> > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
51 |
> wrote: |
52 |
> >> > > > > |
53 |
> >> > > > > |
54 |
> >> > > > > On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 13:59 -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg |
55 |
> wrote: |
56 |
> >> > > > > > On Sunday 17 February 2008 23:12:35 Robert Buchholz wrote: |
57 |
> >> > > > > > > On Sunday, 17. February 2008, Eduardo Tongson wrote: |
58 |
> >> > > > > > > > What specific kernel knowledge is needed to get a |
59 |
> Kernel advisory up |
60 |
> >> > > > > > > > and running ? |
61 |
> >> > > > > > > |
62 |
> >> > > > > > > Between becoming aware of a vulnerability in Linux and |
63 |
> drafting an advisory |
64 |
> >> > > > > > > for one or all kernel sources comes the part where you |
65 |
> review which |
66 |
> >> > > > > > > versions of which kernel sources are affected and |
67 |
> unaffected. You also |
68 |
> >> > > > > > > need to pay attention to specifics of the added |
69 |
> patchsets, which might |
70 |
> >> > > > > > > duplicate vulnerabilities. |
71 |
> >> > > > > > > |
72 |
> >> > > > > > > Parts of the job can indeed be done without Kernel and C |
73 |
> knowledge, but |
74 |
> >> > > > > > > some cannot. So if we draft a new kernel security |
75 |
> *team*, people without C |
76 |
> >> > > > > > > and kernel knowledge are helpful -- some others need to |
77 |
> have it, though. |
78 |
> >> > > > > > > |
79 |
> >> > > > > > > Robert |
80 |
> >> > > > > > |
81 |
> >> > > > > > To be honest, 99% of what is done in the kernel security |
82 |
> team can be done with |
83 |
> >> > > > > > no C knowledge at all. |
84 |
> >> > > > > > |
85 |
> >> > > > > > I'm not an expert C person - far from it - but I |
86 |
> eventually became the head of |
87 |
> >> > > > > > Kernel Security until I retired a few months ago. |
88 |
> >> > > > > > |
89 |
> >> > > > > > Most of it is bug handling. The major problem is a |
90 |
> social, not a technical |
91 |
> >> > > > > > one. Because of the manner in which our kernels are |
92 |
> organized, a single |
93 |
> >> > > > > > vulnerability involves checking upstream version numbers, |
94 |
> coordinating them |
95 |
> >> > > > > > into our downstream version numbers for all sources, |
96 |
> checking to see if the |
97 |
> >> > > > > > sources are effected, figuring out who to CC for the bugs, |
98 |
> then harassing |
99 |
> >> > > > > > them until they do it. |
100 |
> >> > > > > > |
101 |
> >> > > > > > Unlike other security sources, any attempt to hardmask the |
102 |
> package is shutdown |
103 |
> >> > > > > > instantly. The chaos that would result from a kernel |
104 |
> hardmask, even one of |
105 |
> >> > > > > > the lesser used ones, caused me to only successfully order |
106 |
> one over my entire |
107 |
> >> > > > > > career in Gentoo Kernsec... even though more around 30 |
108 |
> would have been |
109 |
> >> > > > > > needed. It is not infrequently that bugs will last six |
110 |
> months without any |
111 |
> >> > > > > > action coming about them, and users are blissfully |
112 |
> unaware. |
113 |
> >> > > > > > |
114 |
> >> > > > > > I am happy to give my input as the former head of Kernel |
115 |
> Security, but it is |
116 |
> >> > > > > > my personal opinion that any advances in kernel security |
117 |
> will require the |
118 |
> >> > > > > > full cooperation of security, and letting the head of |
119 |
> kernel security be able |
120 |
> >> > > > > > to actually enforce threats, as that seems to be the only |
121 |
> way bugs ever get |
122 |
> >> > > > > > resolved. Pleading didn't work - I tried. |
123 |
> >> > > > > > |
124 |
> >> > > > > > -Harlan Lieberman-Berg |
125 |
> >> > > > > > Gentoo Developer Emeritus |
126 |
> >> > > > > |
127 |
> >> > > > > |
128 |
> >> > > > > Every word of what you said is painfully true. The only way |
129 |
> to |
130 |
> >> > > > > accomplish this would be with an Iron Fist(fail) or a team |
131 |
> of ~15 guys |
132 |
> >> > > > > who do nothing but patch and push new kernels and the PR |
133 |
> that goes along |
134 |
> >> > > > > with them every few days. |
135 |
> >> > > > > -- |
136 |
> >> > > > > Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
137 |
> >> > > > > |
138 |
> >> > > > > |
139 |
> >> > > > > |
140 |
> >> > > > > -- |
141 |
> >> > > > > gentoo-security@l.g.o mailing list |
142 |
> >> > > > > |
143 |
> >> > > > > |
144 |
> >> > > > -- |
145 |
> >> > > > gentoo-security@l.g.o mailing list |
146 |
> >> > > > |
147 |
> >> > > > |
148 |
> >> > |
149 |
> >> > -- |
150 |
> >> > gentoo-security@l.g.o mailing list |
151 |
> >> |
152 |
> >> -- |
153 |
> >> Arthur Bispo de Castro |
154 |
> >> Laboratório de Administração e Segurança (LAS/IC) |
155 |
> >> Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
156 |
> >> -- |
157 |
> >> |
158 |
> >> |
159 |
> >> gentoo-security@l.g.o mailing list |
160 |
> >> |
161 |
> >> |
162 |
> > |
163 |
> > |
164 |
> > |
165 |
> |
166 |
> -- |
167 |
> gentoo-security@l.g.o mailing list |
168 |
> |
169 |
> |